Success story

He recovered the costs of his 2009 mortgage, with interest

The bank had rejected his claim in writing; taking it to court changed the outcome.

Zaragoza · Mortgages

€2,350recovered, plus interest from the day he paid them

  1. Situation

    He signed his mortgage in 2009 and paid the notary, Land Registry, administrative agency (gestoría) and valuation costs in full, as banks required at the time. He complained on his own to the bank's customer service department and received a written refusal arguing that the claim was time-barred.

  2. What was done

    The lawyer gathered the original invoices, recalculated what could be claimed under the case law of the Spanish Supreme Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union on the limitation period, and filed the claim with the specialist court in Zaragoza, asking for the bank to be ordered to pay costs.

  3. Outcome

    The judgment ordered the bank to refund €2,350 plus statutory interest from the date of each payment and to pay the legal costs. The client did not pay any fees upfront: they were taken from the amount recovered and from the costs awarded.

More success stories

  • Madrid · Inheritance

    5 months

    to sign the division of the estate, without going to court

    A deadlocked inheritance between three siblings, divided without going to court

    Situation
    After their mother died, three siblings inherited the family flat in Madrid and a bank account. One lived in the home and refused to sell; the other two needed to cash in their share. They had gone more than a year without an agreement and the deadline for Inheritance and Gift Tax (Impuesto sobre Sucesiones y Donaciones) was about to expire.
    What was done
    The inheritance lawyer first filed the tax return to avoid surcharges and then proposed a division in which the brother living in the flat would take it and compensate the other two in cash, based on an independent valuation. When negotiations stalled, she set out in writing the option of a court-ordered division, which sped up the agreement.
    Outcome
    The three siblings signed the deed of partition five months after first getting in touch. The brother who lived in the flat kept it, paying the other two their share over eighteen months, with no lawsuit and no surcharges from the Spanish Tax Agency (Agencia Tributaria).

    M. R. · MadridView the case

  • Alicante · Tax

    €11,400

    of the 3% withholding refunded by the Spanish Tax Agency

    She sold her flat in Alicante from London and recovered the 3% withholding

    Situation
    A London resident for eight years, she sold the apartment she had kept in Alicante. At the notary's office the buyer withheld 3% of the price, as the law requires for non-residents, and nobody explained to her what to do next. She was also worried about a penalty for never having declared the property.
    What was done
    The tax adviser reconstructed the acquisition value using the purchase deed, the taxes paid at the time and the documented renovation work, calculated the real gain and filed form 210 (modelo 210) within the four-month deadline. As the tax due was lower than the amount withheld, the adviser claimed a refund of the difference and regularised the previous years by declaring the imputed income, which was minimal.
    Outcome
    The Spanish Tax Agency (Agencia Tributaria) refunded €11,400 of the amount withheld seven months after form 210 was filed. Regularising the previous years cost less than €300 and avoided any penalty.

    C. L. · UK residentView the case

  • Valencia · Employment

    €28,600

    in compensation acknowledged at the conciliation hearing

    A disciplinary dismissal that ended in compensation for unfair dismissal

    Situation
    A maintenance technician with eleven years at the company, he received a disciplinary dismissal letter for alleged lateness that did not appear in any record. The letter included no compensation and the company offered him a final settlement (finiquito) to sign “to keep things simple”. He made his enquiry with twelve working days already used up.
    What was done
    The employment lawyer filed the conciliation request (papeleta de conciliación) the next day, asked the company for the working-time records that the law requires it to keep and prepared the unfair dismissal claim with the payslips to calculate the compensation of 33 days per year worked.
    Outcome
    At the conciliation hearing, without going to trial, the company acknowledged that the dismissal was unfair and paid €28,600 in compensation plus the full final settlement. The employee was paid within thirty days.

    J. P. · ValenciaView the case

See all cases

No-obligation enquiry

Do you have a similar case?

Tell us about it in 2 minutes and we'll put you in touch with a lawyer who specialises in your issue.

  • Making an enquiry is free
  • Your details, always confidential
  • No obligation to hire
Your enquiry
What do you need help with?

Choose the area closest to your case.

How soon do you need it?

This tells us whether any deadlines are running.

How can we reach you?

A specialist lawyer will call you to assess your case.

Got it, {nombre}!

A specialist lawyer will review your enquiry and call you as soon as possible.

  • Under 2 min
  • Confidential
  • No obligation

Talk to a lawyer who understands your case

Tell us about your case
Tell us about your case